home *** CD-ROM | disk | FTP | other *** search
/ Light ROM 4 / Light ROM 4 - Disc 1.iso / text / maillist / 1995 / 0895.doc / 000598_owner-lightwav…mail.webcom.com_Mon Aug 28 07:15:43 1995.msg < prev    next >
Internet Message Format  |  1995-09-02  |  3KB
  1. Received: by mail.webcom.com
  2.     (1.37.109.15/16.2) id AA156809343; Mon, 28 Aug 1995 07:15:43 -0700
  3. Return-Path: <owner-lightwave@mail.webcom.com>
  4. Received: from stpaul.gov (pwcs.stpaul.gov) by mail.webcom.com with SMTP
  5.     (1.37.109.15/16.2) id AA156049314; Mon, 28 Aug 1995 07:15:14 -0700
  6. Received: from dollars.stpaul.gov ([142.49.65.16]) by stpaul.gov (4.1/SMI-4.1)
  7.     id AA01203; Mon, 28 Aug 95 09:08:17 CDT
  8. Received: from sppd.stpaul.gov by dollars.stpaul.gov (4.1/SMI-4.1)
  9.     id AA10537; Mon, 28 Aug 95 09:06:11 CDT
  10. Received: by sppd.stpaul.gov (4.1/SMI-4.1)
  11.     id AA01568; Mon, 28 Aug 95 09:06:10 CDT
  12. Message-Id: <9508281406.AA01568@sppd.stpaul.gov>
  13. Received: from wpmail   id: 3041D0A9.7F1
  14.     (WordPerfect SMTP Gateway V3.1a  04/27/92)
  15. Received: from sppd    (WP Connection)
  16. Received: from TCPGATE    (WP Connection)
  17. Received: from PED10    (WP Connection)
  18. Received: from COUNCIL    (WP Connection)
  19. Received: from CLERK    (WP Connection)
  20. Received: from CIS    (WP Connection)
  21. From: <LLOYD%wpmail@sppd.stpaul.gov>  (ALAN LLOYD )
  22. To: <LIGHTWAVE@mail.webcom.com>
  23. Subject: Re: Anyone using Studio 16 with Flyer?  
  24. Date: Mon Aug 28 09:20:25 1995
  25. Sender: owner-lightwave@mail.webcom.com
  26. Precedence: bulk
  27.  
  28. TIGGER8181@aol.com writes:
  29.  
  30. > "...something called "Servo-Bump"...(snip)...will lend
  31. > secure frame accuracy to your linear editing."
  32.  
  33. Yes, it's nice to have that.  Makes cueing up for the edit a
  34. painfully slow process but worth it to be able to have some of
  35. these things:
  36.  
  37. 1) 2 x PCM (digital) audio tracks
  38.  
  39. 2) On-board TBC (with remote control capability, although the
  40. controls could have been hidden better, I actually found them the
  41. first day we uncrated ours!)
  42.  
  43. 3) S-video, composite, and 3/4"(SP) dub out
  44.  
  45. 4) Higher bandwidth than 3/4"SP _or_ S-VHS (better resolution)
  46.  
  47. As for the UVW-1800, we demo'ed one...B-rolls from Hi8 to it were
  48. indistinguishable from the cam. tapes...at least through our
  49. monitors...BetaSP sure is nice.
  50.  
  51. BTW, if you've _not_ seen how good even an older PAR can look on
  52. BetaSP component out, you ought to.  Frankly, anyone considering
  53. anything but BetaSP now for a format needs to re-examine that
  54. decision.  True, the UVW machines are not quite as feature-laden
  55. as the BVW or PVW line, but so what?  NO cross-color, NO dot
  56. crawl, _much faster_ cue-up, and the best multigenerational
  57. performance of any industrial machine.  Check it out!
  58.  
  59. ObLightWave: Sorry, don't actually have one this time, just a
  60. video-related post.  Next time...
  61.  
  62. -----------------------------------------------------------------------------
  63. Alan Lloyd                                              
  64. alan.lloyd@stpaul.gov
  65. >> All standard disclaimers apply.  Non-standard disclaimers
  66.    available on request.
  67. -----------------------------------------------------------------------------
  68.  
  69. --
  70. <LLOYD%wpmail@sppd.stpaul.gov>  (ALAN LLOYD ) sent this message.
  71. To Post a Message           : lightwave@webcom.com
  72. Un/Subscription Requests To : lightwave-request@webcom.com
  73. (DIGEST)                 or : lightwave-digest-request@webcom.com
  74. Administrative Items To     : owner-lightwave@webcom.com